Truby TV | Newsletter |
My Account
Contact: trubystudio@truby.com | (310) 573 9630
facebook
twitter
youtube
google_plus

  • HOME
  • STORE
  • STORY SOFTWARE
    • BLOCKBUSTER
    • GENRE ADD-ONS
  • CLASSES
    • AUDIO CLASSES
  • NOVELS
    • Novel Consultation
    • Novelists Talk
    • Novelists’ Corner
  • MOVIE & TV BREAKDOWNS
    • Action
    • Comedy
    • Crime
    • Detective
    • Drama
    • Fantasy
    • Horror
    • Love Story
    • Masterpiece
    • Memoir – True Story
    • Myth
    • Sitcom
    • SciFi
    • TV Drama
    • Thriller
    • Novels
    • Oscars



Cold Mountain (2003)

1 Comment

Truby-ColdMountainSpoiler Alert: This breakdown contains information about the ending of the film. 

The myth-drama is one of the most powerful story combinations that we have. Myth gives us the hero’s journey and the epic scope. Drama gives us the family and the deep, complex issue. When the love story is added, we have the potential for a real knockout. 

Unfortunately, the original writer of Cold Mountain structured his story in such a way as to remove much of the power of the myth-drama. By doing a straight cross-cut between the two leads for most of the story, the hero’s journey does not build and the family cannot explore a central issue through conflict. 

Cold Mountain is obviously The Odyssey set during the Civil War. In The Odyssey, Homer also cuts between the traveling Ulysses and the faithful Penelope back home. But notice the key difference in structure. Homer doesn’t do an equal crosscut. He heavily weights the story in favor of the traveling hero. This gives the story a building line and a powerful spine on which to hang all the symbolic elements that come with the myth form (for more on this see the Myth Class). 

The biggest drawback to doing a crosscut throughout most ofCold Mountain is that it kills the love story. The lovers barely have time to meet and have a quick kiss before they are separated. Yet we are supposed to believe they will both fight through three years of silence and the worst assaults of war to get back together. 

Of course the thematic point of the crosscut is that the juxtaposition of the two story lines creates a larger point through comparison. But here that comparison remains on the broadest level, showing that the two leads are equal in the obstacles they must overcome for their love. But the specific scenes where the crosscuts occur are largely wasted. 

This film almost overcomes its foundation structural weakness through a number of excellent scenes. But then it commits one of the great sins of storytelling, the false ending. When an audience invests two and a half hours of their time watching two people struggle through hell to be together, you better have a profound reason to kill one of them at the end. 

In Cold Mountain, we’re not even close to profound. Yes, in war, especially civil war, a lot of people die. But by that logic, you could kill off everyone in this story. But killing off one of the lovers after all that effort serves no thematic point, and gives no new story value. 

It is fake tragedy, what I call “death ex machina.” It doesn’t make your movie better. It just pisses people off.

One Comment
  1. Pingback: Cold Mountain 2003 – سایت خبری market-center

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Related Products


Blockbuster


How Do You Tell a Great Story?


"I'm not exaggerating: Truby's Blockbuster revolutionized how I work. It's the simplest way I've ever found to build structure, character and theme. If you use a computer to write screenplays, you'll want Blockbuster."

Laurence Dworet, Writer of Outbreak


© Copyright 2013 John Truby All Rights Reserved